4 February 2015, Rome — As world leaders met in London today to raise funds in support of millions of people affected by the ongoing conflict in Syria, FAO stressed the urgent need to help farming families produce food to meet basic needs.
Within Syria, 8.7 million are in need of food security assistance, out of an estimated 13.5 million people who continue to be in need of urgent humanitarian assistance.
“It is clear that imported food assistance alone cannot feed the country — that’s why maintaining food production amidst this conflict is so critical,” said FAO Assistant Director-General Laurent Thomas today.
“Farmers want to stay on their land – but if we fail to support them, they will have no choice but to abandon their farms, joining the growing contingent of refugees and internally displaced people in search of food, shelter and income opportunities elsewhere,” he added.
In all, half of the people that remain in Syria today do not have enough food to eat and are unable to meet their basic food needs.
Another 4.6 million Syrians have crossed borders to become refugees in neighbouring countries. This not only puts stress on refugee families but also on their host communities, many of which struggle to cope with the influx of people.
Moreover, in the past 18 months, prices for wheat flour have tripled in some markets inside Syria and rice prices have risen more than six fold.
Unemployment, inflation, and the depreciation of the Syrian pound, meanwhile, have further eroded the capacity of families to feed themselves and cope amidst the crisis.
Massive displacements and migration of rural populations are progressively depriving the rural sector of its human capital and much needed skills, contributing to a vicious circle where lack of protection, erosion of livelihoods base and loss of economic opportunities become inextricably linked.
Agriculture remains main source of employment in rural areas
A lack of access to seeds and other essential farming supplies is making it very difficult for farmers to continue to grow food and keep their livestock healthy.
According to the latest assessments, Syria’s 2015 wheat production alone was 40 percent lower than the pre-conflict average, increasing the need for imports and dealing a further blow to food security in the country.
The livestock sector, too, has taken a significant hit, with 30 percent fewer cattle, 40 percent fewer goats and only half the number of poultry left in 2015, compared with 2011, as infrastructure is destroyed, animals fall sick or are looted, or families are forced to sell or slaughter their livestock to cope.
In neighbouring countries, agriculture has been identified by many as one of the sectors that can boost local economies and offer greater labour market and employment opportunities for both refugees and host communities.
But in order to fulfil that potential, adequate resources need to be mobilized quickly to help farmers rebuild and maintain production now.
“Today, the international donor community is coming together to support the Syrian people amidst one of the most brutal conflicts of the 21st Century,” said Thomas. “In that global response agriculture simply cannot be an afterthought — it has to be recognized as essential to people’s livelihoods and a prerequisite for peace.”
FAO response to the crisis
As part of the UN’s $3.18 billion Syria Response Plan, FAO is asking for $87 million to support 2.9 million vulnerable people improve their access to food, better nutrition and income through 2016.
Last year, FAO reached 1.5 million people across the country with distributions of wheat and barley seeds, vegetable production kits, and live poultry. Animal feed and livestock vaccination campaigns, in turn, have kept remaining herds healthy while vulnerable families who have lost livestock benefited from distribution of sheep to rebuild their livelihoods.
Investing in the capacity of farmers to produce food locally is not only effective in improving the food security of people who have remained in Syria but also in preventing further migration in the coming months.
Only $200, for example, allow a farmer to produce enough wheat to feed a family of six for a year.
And yet, emergency agricultural interventions were 70 percent underfunded in 2015.